"I don't like joining seams, so I knitted this in the round instead."
or,
"I translated this pattern into the round."
...end of story.
I started to think about HOW exactly this is done. In one sense, it seems simple: just double the stitches you cast on and follow the pattern according. But then... I realized it wasn't that simple. For odd rounds, you're all set. But for even rounds, you'll have to REVERSE the stitches. So, a pattern written like this:
Row 1: k
Row 2: p
Is actually different in the round:
Rows 1-2: k
I tested this out with the Crazy Dress I made for Jordan, and it worked pretty well. Shaping the arms required some adjustment and guesswork, but it came out fine.
Now, I'm doing it with the amazing skirt on the cover of Vogue Knitting (Spring/Summer 2009). I would've been completely stumped had I needed to do something complicated in an odd row (and therefore, "backwards"), but luckily the odd rows are mostly knitted.
Of course--I can't replicate the pattern here (which would be a violation of copyright and therefore, strictly "no-no"), I can make a few recommendations.
This skirt starts from the bottom and is knit upwards--the opposite of my trumpet skirt, which was knit from the waist down. Because it is intended to be knit in two pieces, it's important that the edges to be joined (on the side seam) be consistent. So, each piece is stockingette on both sides.
If you're knitting in the round, however, you don't have to worry about that. So, I just started with lace stripe pattern without the beginning knit stitches. I also made a slight transformation by just starting with k10 rather than splitting the stitches into k5, lace, k5 (if you look at the pattern, this will make sense).
Because this is a lot of knitting and fine yarn, it will be a while before I can report on the other sections. Wish me luck!
Here it is so far. Isn't it pretty? It's just a big, round ruffle.
Ok... maybe not. Here's some detail on the lace after only 13 rows. :)